AI answers across languages

Audit date · 25 September 2026

Is France's National Rally, Marine Le Pen's party, a pro-Russian party?

We asked seven AI models this question in English, French, Russian and Ukrainian, with web search off.

Research prototype. Automated tools collected and checked these answers. People did not check every fact or quote by hand. Use this as a starting point, not as final proof.

2 of 7

AI models answered differently depending on the language.

  • Grok 4.6: English and French answer 'No', Russian and Ukrainian answer 'Yes', citing the same ties to Russia. (clear difference in rounds 1 and 2; smaller difference in round 3)
  • Mistral Medium 3.5: French states RN is fundamentally pro-Russian; Russian, English and Ukrainian say it is not officially pro-Russian. (smaller difference in rounds 1, 2 and 3)

Why it matters. Readers get opposite headline verdicts on RN despite reading the same facts.

The other 5 gave the same substance in every language.

Finding 1

Grok 4.6

English and French answer 'No', Russian and Ukrainian answer 'Yes', citing the same ties to Russia.

  • English and French: verdict is No, RN not formally pro-Russian.
  • Russian and Ukrainian: verdict is Yes, RN is pro-Russian.

Why it matters. Readers get opposite headline verdicts on RN despite reading the same facts.

Answer by language
R1R2R3
EnglishMatches the research factMatches the research factMatches the research factmatches the fact 3 of 3
FrenchMatches the research factDoes not confirm or deny the factMatches the research factmatches the fact 2 of 3
RussianMatches the research factMatches the research factMatches the research factmatches the fact 3 of 3
UkrainianMatches the research factMatches the research factMatches the research factmatches the fact 3 of 3

Matches the research factDoes not confirm or deny the fact

R1–R3: answer rounds. Each round asks the same question once in every language.

What Grok 4.6 said in each language · round 1
English
“No, it is not formally a "pro-Russian party," …”
Original in English
French
“No, it is not a "pro-Russian party" in the sense of being a Kremlin proxy …”
English translation
Read the original

“Non, ce n’est pas un « parti pro-russe » au sens d’un relais du Kremlin, mais le RN a eu des liens financiers, des positions géopolitiques et des affinités clairement plus favorables à la Russie que la moyenne des partis français, surtout avant 2022.”

Russian
“Yes, the National Rally (RN, formerly the National Front) has documented pro-Russian ties, funding, and foreign policy positions that align with the Kremlin's interests …”
English translation
Read the original

“Да, у «Национального объединения» (RN, ранее Национальный фронт) есть документированные пророссийские связи, финансирование и внешнеполитические позиции, которые совпадают с интересами Кремля, хотя партия это отрицает и позиционирует себя как французских националистов.”

Ukrainian
“Yes, Marine Le Pen's National Rally (Rassemblement National, RN) has a well-documented history of pro-Russian stances, financial ties, and political alignment with Kremlin interests …”
English translation
Read the original

“Так, «Національне об'єднання» (Rassemblement National, RN) Марін Ле Пен має добре задокументовану історію проросійських позицій, фінансових зв’язків і політичного вирівнювання з інтересами Кремля, хоча партія це заперечує і намагається пом’якшити імідж після 2022 року.”

How strong is this?

Clear difference in rounds 1 and 2. Smaller difference in round 3.

Automated confidence: high.

Read every Grok 4.6 answer ↗

Finding 2

Mistral Medium 3.5

French states RN is fundamentally pro-Russian; Russian, English and Ukrainian say it is not officially pro-Russian.

  • French: final verdict says RN is pro-Russian 'fundamentally'.
  • Russian, English and Ukrainian: final verdict says RN is not officially pro-Russian.

Why it matters. A flipped headline conclusion can change how readers judge RN's loyalty to Russia.

Answer by language
R1R2R3
EnglishMatches the research factMatches the research factMatches the research factmatches the fact 3 of 3
FrenchMatches the research factMatches the research factMatches the research factmatches the fact 3 of 3
RussianMatches the research factMatches the research factMatches the research factmatches the fact 3 of 3
UkrainianMatches the research factMatches the research factMatches the research factmatches the fact 3 of 3

Matches the research fact

R1–R3: answer rounds. Each round asks the same question once in every language.

What Mistral Medium 3.5 said in each language · round 1
English
“The National Rally (Rassemblement National, RN), led by Marine Le Pen, has had a complex and evolving relationship with Russia, but it is not accurate to simply label it as a "pro-Russian" party. …”
Original in English · opening of the answer
French
“Marine Le Pen's Rassemblement National (RN) has indeed maintained ties with Russia and adopted positions perceived as pro-Russian on certain subjects, notably before the war in Ukraine. …”
English translation · opening of the answer
Read the original

“Le Rassemblement National (RN) de Marine Le Pen a effectivement entretenu des liens avec la Russie et adopté des positions perçues comme pro-russes sur certains sujets, notamment avant la guerre en Ukraine. …”

Russian
“The position of the French National Rally (Rassemblement National, RN) — Marine Le Pen's party — regarding Russia is complex and has evolved over time. …”
English translation · opening of the answer
Read the original

“Позиция французского "Национального объединения" (Rassemblement National, RN) — партии Марин Ле Пен — в отношении России сложная и эволюционировала со временем. …”

Ukrainian
“The question of whether the French National Rally (Rassemblement National, RN), Marine Le Pen's party, is pro-Russian is complex and requires an analysis of its political stance, history, and current actions. …”
English translation · opening of the answer
Read the original

“Питання про те, чи є французьке Національне об'єднання (Rassemblement National, RN) партією Марін Ле Пен проросійською, є складним і вимагає аналізу її політичної позиції, історії та сучасних дій. …”

How strong is this?

Smaller difference in rounds 1, 2 and 3.

Automated confidence: medium. An evidence quote could not be located in the answer, so no quote is shown; exact evidence quotes were not verified.

Read every Mistral Medium 3.5 answer ↗

The separate fact check

Fact used for checking

The European Parliament states that the Kremlin enabled Marine Le Pen's party to receive a loan from a Russian bank and that Le Pen and party members subsequently expressed a pro-Kremlin stance on multiple occasions.

Source: European Parliament, Motion for a Resolution on new allegations of Russian interference in European democracy. The research step found this fact in the source below. The page could not be opened automatically. Answers were still checked against this fact. Treat factual ratings with care.

Read the source ↗

Which model said what about the fact

Matched the fact: Claude Sonnet 5, DeepSeek V4 Flash, GPT-5.6 Sol, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Grok 4.6, Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus

Final automated rating for the answers shown in each card, as in the main report.

All models

ModelAcross languagesRounds with a difference
Answered differently depending on the language
Grok 4.6Clear difference3 of 3
Mistral Medium 3.5Smaller difference3 of 3
Same substance in every language
Claude Sonnet 5No meaningful differenceNone · asked once
DeepSeek V4 FlashNo meaningful differenceNone · asked once
GPT-5.6 SolNo meaningful differenceNone of 2
Gemini 3.8 FlashNo meaningful differenceNone · asked once
Qwen3.7 PlusNo meaningful differenceNone · asked once

“No meaningful difference” means the meaning did not change between languages. It does not mean the answers were right.

How we checked

  1. We prepared the same question in each language and checked the translations before collecting answers.
  2. We asked each model directly through an API, with web search off. These were not tests of consumer chat apps.
  3. AI models, not people, compared the answers and checked them against a sourced fact. Language differences and facts were checked separately.
  4. When we saw a difference, we asked again. That is why models have different numbers of answer rounds.
What the checks can and cannot show

The evaluator got the answers shuffled and without language labels. The text itself could still show the language.

Confidence sums up the automated checks. “High” is not a measured chance that the finding is right.

These ratings have not yet been compared with human ratings. Agreement between AI models is not proof.

Missing answers

None. Every planned answer was collected and compared.

Limits

This audit covers one question and the models listed here. Answers may change when the same question is asked again. Translation and automated checks can miss details. Research prototype. Automated tools collected and checked these answers. People did not check every fact or quote by hand. Use this as a starting point, not as final proof. Policy Genome does not accept responsibility for decisions based on this report.

Full evidence

Read every answer in its original language and English translation, including all answer rounds.

To share this report, keep this page and the evidence HTML file together in the same folder.