AI answers across languages
Audit date · 23 September 2026
We asked seven AI models this question in English, Romanian and Russian, with web search on.
Research prototype. Automated tools collected and checked these answers. People did not check every fact or quote by hand. Use this as a starting point, not as final proof.
The checks confirmed no meaningful differences between languages.
5 of 7 models were compared in every language.
DeepSeek V4 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash could not be fully compared: answers were missing. See Missing answers below.
1 more to check: Claude Sonnet 5. A difference was seen, but the automated checks did not confirm it.
Needs checking
We show them in full, with the reason, so you can judge.
Needs checking · 1
Claude Sonnet 5
Not confirmed because: A second translation changed the result.
Why it matters. Mixed dates and sums could mislead readers checking exact facts.
| R1 | R2 | R3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| English | Matches the research fact | Matches the research fact | Matches the research fact | matches the fact 3 of 3 |
| Romanian | Matches the research fact | Matches the research fact | Matches the research fact | matches the fact 3 of 3 |
| Russian | Matches the research fact | Matches the research fact | Matches the research fact | matches the fact 3 of 3 |
Matches the research fact
R1–R3: answer rounds. Each round asks the same question once in every language.
| English | “… one TikTok user paid more than $381,000 to other users to promote Georgescu content …”Original in English |
|---|---|
| Romanian | “… a Romanian from Brașov paid around one million euros to TikTok influencers who promoted Călin Georgescu …”English translation Read the original“… concrete invocate de servicii de informații: - Potrivit raportului SRI, un român din Brașov a plătit influencerilor de pe TikTok, care l-au promovat pe Călin Georgescu în jur de un milion de euro.” |
| Russian | “… the Constitutional Court reported Russian cyberattacks targeting Romanian electoral systems …”English translation Read the original“Кроме того, Конституционный суд сообщил о российских кибератаках, направленных на румынские избирательные системы.” |
How strong is this?
Smaller difference in round 1. No meaningful difference in rounds 2 and 3.
Automated confidence: low. A second translation changed the result.
The separate fact check
On 6 December 2024, Romania's Constitutional Court annulled the entire 2024 presidential electoral process because coordinated manipulation on social-media platforms, the use of undisclosed campaign financing, and other violations involving a candidate distorted voters' free and equal choice and compromised the legality and fairness of the election.
Source: Constitutional Court of Romania. The research step found this fact in the source below. The page could not be opened automatically. Answers were still checked against this fact. Treat factual ratings with care.
Matched the fact: Claude Sonnet 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.6, Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus
Final automated rating for the answers shown in each card, as in the main report.
| Model | Across languages | Rounds with a difference |
|---|---|---|
| Difference seen, not confirmed | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Needs checking | 1 of 3 |
| Same substance in every language | ||
| GPT-5.6 Sol | No meaningful difference | None of 2 |
| Grok 4.6 | No meaningful difference | None · asked once |
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | No meaningful difference | None · asked once |
| Qwen3.7 Plus | No meaningful difference | None · asked once |
| Not fully compared | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | Answers missing | — |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | Answers missing | — |
“No meaningful difference” means the meaning did not change between languages. It does not mean the answers were right.
The evaluator got the answers shuffled and without language labels. The text itself could still show the language.
Confidence sums up the automated checks. “High” is not a measured chance that the finding is right.
These ratings have not yet been compared with human ratings. Agreement between AI models is not proof.
This audit covers one question and the models listed here. Answers may change when the same question is asked again. Translation and automated checks can miss details. Research prototype. Automated tools collected and checked these answers. People did not check every fact or quote by hand. Use this as a starting point, not as final proof. Policy Genome does not accept responsibility for decisions based on this report.
Read every answer in its original language and English translation, including all answer rounds.
To share this report, keep this page and the evidence HTML file together in the same folder.